http://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/ele ... ration.pdf
Goldman Says Trump's Presidency Will Benefit Stocks in Almost Every Sector
November 30, 2016 — 9:04 AM EST
After years of slowing earnings growth and little in the way of excitement for many Wall Street analysts, many are now hopeful that President-elect Donald Trump will finally make things interesting.
When collating data for the Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Analyst Index — a proprietary measure of growth across different sectors of the S&P 500 — the firm included a question this month on what the election of Donald Trump will mean for the industries covered by those surveyed. Turns out, they are rather optimistic.
"This month, we asked analysts to comment on how the results of the U.S. election will affect companies in their respective sectors," the team led by Avisha Thakkar writes in the new note. "While their responses suggest that there is still uncertainty about the sector-level impact, the majority of sectors are anticipating favorable effects," they say, adding that expectations of lower tax rates and economic stimulus are among key reasons for the favorable outlook.
Goldman certainly isn't the first to hail the potential benefits of a Trump presidency. Dubravko Lakos-Bujas and Marko Kolanovic, quantitative analysts at JPMorgan Chase and Co., also wrote that many of Trump's policies would be "pro-growth," even while uncertainty about specifics remains high.
They wrote this week that if the campaign promises that have the potential to stimulate growth get implemented, the S&P 500 could see as much as $20 in additional earnings-per-share growth over the next few years.
Still, "it is difficult to overstate just how wide the range of possible policy outcomes is currently," they said. "While majority of President-elect Trump's policies are pro-growth for equities, parts of his more populist rhetoric could significantly disrupt the economy," they add, pointing to the promise of stricter trade policies. The strategists' skepticism that all the former real-estate mogul's campaign promises will go through means they stop short of incorporating the effects into their base-case earnings forecasts.
Of course there's no suggestion that all industries will benefit alike: Goldman's analysts expect some to miss out, and some even to suffer under Trump. Some respondents said they expected the election outcome to weigh negatively on their sectors; among those were autos, aerospace, clean energy, and agribusiness. "Concerns regarding the outlook for business activity stem from potentially more restrictive trade policy, notably for clean energy and agricultural industries, and higher inflationary pressures," according to Thakkar and team.
While many of the Goldman analysts surveyed are optimistic, the firm's Chief U.S. Equity Strategist David Kostin also sounded a note of caution. In a separate report, his team moot the possibility that the "hope" that has enveloped markets since the surprise election result could fade within months of the 45th president's inauguration.
"Fear is likely to pervade during second half and the S&P 500 will end 2017 at 2,300," according to Kostin et al. While that would be 5 percent above where we are trading today, it would also mark a decline of nearly 5 percent from the 2,400 they expect the S&P 500 to be trading at during the first half of the year.
Sam Meredith | @smeredith19
7 Hours Ago | 01:29
Italian citizens will vote on constitutional reform on Sunday in what is seen by many analysts as the most significant European political event of 2016. Yes, even bigger than Brexit.
What are Italian citizens voting on?
Constitutional reform. Prime Minister Matteo Renzi is campaigning for a "yes" victory in an effort to make it easier to govern the nation moving forwards.
The reforms would remove power from the Senate and mean that proposed laws would only require the approval of the lower house of parliament, as opposed to the current system which requires approval from both houses.
Renzi has even gambled his political future on the referendum having said he would resign if a "yes" vote is rejected.
A "no" vote, as championed by populist party Five Star Movement (5SM), would block the reforms to streamline Italy's public administration and would mean the extensive checks currently required stay in place.
Francesco Oggiano, the author of "Beppo Grillo Parlante", told CNBC on November 14 that he believed 5SM's opposition to the proposed reforms boils down to a new electoral system perceived to be attached to the reforms.
"According to the 5SM, people won't be able to choose their own representatives in the parliament and this is the most important point," Oggiano explained.
"The result (of a 'yes' victory) would be a parliament full of bureaucrats chosen from their parties that, once elected, will just get to satisfy their leader instead of people's needs," he added.
Will the reforms be accepted or rejected?
The latest opinion polls, published before a two-week blackout phase of polling in Italy, indicated a 53.5 percent to 46.5 percent in favor of the "no" camp.
Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg Bank, said in a note on Tuesday he believed the likelihood is that Italy's citizens would reject the reforms.
"Some whispers suggest that more than half of the up to 20 percent of undecided voters may back Renzi in the end," Schmieding said.
"Also, many of the rebellious young people who oppose Renzi may not bother to vote. Whereas the outcome is thus no foregone conclusion, I put the probability of a 'no' vote at 60 percent," he added.
What happens after the result is announced?
Whatever happens, Adolfo Laurenti, global economist at J. Safra Sarasin, described the post-referendum scenario in a note as "uninspiring".
"While the reform has some intrinsic merits, the domestic debate is centered on the effort to unseat the prime minister. At the same time, financial markets see the vote as a test of the appetite of reform in the country," he concluded.
Analysts from Barclays published a note on Monday to forecast the circumstances in the aftermath of a "yes" or "no" outcome.
If the referendum is approved and the majority of voters opt for "yes" on Sunday, then the U.K. bank expects Renzi to stay on as prime minister, for the voting system to be amended and for an election to take place in the second or third quarter of 2017.
Barclays analysts also anticipated a resilient market reaction on Monday with little movement in Italian spreads.
If the reforms are rejected and the outcome of the referendum is "no" then Barclays analysts anticipate Renzi will resign, the voting system to be modified in order to avoid a hung parliament, early elections to be called in the second or third quarter of 2017 and for Italian spreads to perform poorly in the following day's trading.
Could this spark an early election?
Definitely a maybe. Larissa Brunner, analyst for Western Europe at think tank Oxford Analytica, argued that the likelihood of a snap election as a consequence of the referendum is totally reliant on the outcome.
Should a national election be called in Italy in 2017 then 5SM appear to stand a strong chance of winning the majority of votes.
Opinion polls suggest they are five percentage points behind Renzi's Democratic Party, however, a referendum loss, party infighting and even a potential split could hand the initiative to 5SM.
"(In the context of Europe), if Renzi wins then he may well become more confrontational and stretch EU deficit laws even further while pursuing a more expansionary monetary policy which could be interesting but if he loses … Well, it's anyone's guess," Brunner concluded.
How vulnerable are Italy's banks?
Very. Officials and senior bankers according to various media reports anticipate that up to eight of Italy's troubled lenders are at risk of failure should Renzi lose the upcoming referendum.
Megan Greene, chief economist at Manulife Asset Management, believed that the referendum in Italy could provoke another banking crisis in Europe.
"In my view the biggest risk is actually for the banking sector, even more so than political risk, and there will be some political instability," Greene told CNBC on Tuesday.
The third-largest euro zone economy had been weakened by a deep recession which left behind 356 billion euros ($377 billion) in gross problem loans and Italian banks need at least 20 billion euros in capital in the coming months to cover losses from fresh loan write-downs and planned bad debt disposals, according to a Reuters report.
A "no" vote could conceivably cause financial instability and possibly even panic among investors which would therefore be significantly detrimental to Italy's banking sector.
用户浏览此论坛: 没有注册用户 和 3 访客